Long before science makes it to the courts, it must be vetted through a scientific process called peer review.
Category Archives: Policy
Better Juries through Science
What does science tell us about how to improve juries?
Perspectives on Improving Global Judicial Systems
What are the global challenges to justice – and the solutions?
3 Important (and Quick) Questions to Ask Yourself when Writing for a Policymaker Audience
When writing for a policymaker audience, ask yourself these three questions to make your writing more impactful.
What Are the Real-World Impacts of the Daubert Test?
The Daubert test was intended to make scientific evidence admitted in courts more reliable and trustworthy – but has it?
Where Does Science Fit in Each of the 3 Branches of US Government?
Sheeva talks about her experiences in all three branches of government in a video series.
Are Judges Gatekeepers of Science in the Courts?
Short answer: yes, judges do act as gatekeepers of scientific evidence.
What Makes Fancy Comma, LLC Unique?
Learn about Fancy Comma, LLC’s dual mission to explain complex subjects for our clients as well as help scientists-in-training communicate better.
Evaluating Scientific Evidence in Court with the “Daubert Test”
The “Daubert test” was introduced in 1993, as the result of a Supreme Court case, to evaluate scientific evidence in the courts.
8 Books for Ethical Communication
Ethical communication works. Learn how to communicate ethically with these books.
Fancy Comma, LLC 